Работа эмулятора была восстановлена, и теперь снова можно играть в денди игры онлайн :)
Common Mistakes: Practical Web Standards: What do you need to know
Рейтинг: (Голосов: 1) Вы уже голосовали!
Inadequate functional specification for Web projects such as Web sites, Intranets or Sites contribute largely to gaps, higher costs or in applications which experts claim not match the beliefs. Independent if the Web site, Intranet or Web destination is personalized developed or built upon packaged software program such as Web-, enterprise content material management or portal program, the useful specification lies the foundation to get project holds off and bigger costs. To limit gaps and surprising investments throughout the development method, the following risks should be avoided:
Too vague or imperfect functional requirements: This is the most popular mistake that companies perform. Everything that is definitely ambiguously or not specified at all, programmers do not implement or use in a different way of what site owners want. This relates largely to Net features which can be considered as prevalent user expected values. For example , HTML title tags, which are used to bookmark Websites. The Web guiding committee may well specify that each page is made up of a page subject, but would not specify that HTML Subject tags should be implemented as well. Web developers www.vidak.be for that reason may usually do not implement CODE Title tags or apply them in a method, which may differ from site owners' visions. There are other examples including error managing on online forms or perhaps the definition of alt texts for images to comply with the disability work section 508. These versions of look like facts but in practice, if builders need to change hundreds or even thousands of pages, this amounts to many man-days or maybe man-weeks. Specifically, the corrections for photos as entrepreneurs need primary to outline the image brands prior that Web developers can implement the ATL text messaging. Ambiguous functional specification can result because of the lack of interior or external missing usability skills. In cases like this, a one-day usability very best practice workshop transfers the mandatory or at least basic usability skills to the Web team. It is suggested, even pertaining to companies that have usability expertise or rely on the subcontractor's skill set, that an external and neutral advisor reviews the functional specs. Especially, as such reviews refer to marginal spending as compared to the whole Web investment opportunities (e. g. about $10,50 K -- $15 T dollars to get a review).
Future web page enhancement not really identified or not disseminated: It is crucial the fact that the Web committee identifies for least the top future site enhancements and communicates these to the development crew. In the very best case, the development team has learned the map for the coming three years. Such an approach enables the development group to predict implementation options to a lot future web page enhancements. It truly is more cost effective in mid- or long-term to get more in the beginning and to produce a flexible treatment. If Internet teams are not aware of or even dismiss future improvements, the risk with regards to higher purchase increases (e. g. adding new efficiency in the future ends in partially or at worst in totally rebuilding existing functionality). Looking at the financial delta for a versatile solution vs a solution merely satisfying the actual requirements, the flexible method has proved to be more cost-effective in practice from a mid- and long-term perspective.
Planned functionality certainly not aligned with internal information: Many companies look at site operation only from a site visitor point of view (e. g. facilitation of searching info or undertaking transaction) and corporate benefits (e. g. fiscal benefits of self-service features). Yet , there is a third dimension the effect of web page functionality on internal information. Site operation that can heavily impact inside resources will be for example: -- Web sites: rendering news, on line recruitment, internet support, and so forth - Intranets / sites: providing content maintenance efficiency for business managers
It is essential for the success of site operation that the Web committee analyzes the impact and takes activities to ensure business of the organized functionality. For instance , providing this content maintenance functionality to company owners and merchandise mangers with an linked workflow. This kind of functionality works well and can generate business benefits such as lowered time to market. However , used, business owners and product managers will need to publish, validate, assessment, approve and retire content material. This ends up with additional workload. If the Internet committee hasn't defined inside the Web governance (processes, insurance policies, ownership and potentially enforcement), it may happen that this features is not really used and so becomes pointless.
Wish to do this versus actual needs and business requirements: The practical specification is definitely not aligned with user's needs or perhaps business requirements. This is more usual for internal applications such as Intranets or perhaps portals. On many occasions, the job committee neglects to perform a sound internal survey and defines operation by generalizing individual employees' wishes with no sound proves. Capturing the feedback of internal users across the group allows identifying the crucial functionality. To effectively perform a survey a representative set of personnel need to be wondered. Further these kinds of employees must be categorized in profiles. The profiles need to be characterized by for example , frequency of usage of the Intranet, believed duration by simply visit, using the Intranet to aid their daily tasks, contribution to the organization, etc . Based on this information the internet team are able to prioritize the functionality and find the most effective and relevant functionality for the next release. Less significant or significantly less important functionality may be element of future releases (roadmap) or perhaps dropped. In the event such a sound decision process is definitely not performed, it may happen that features is created but simply used by handful of users plus the return of investment is usually not realized.
Not enough aesthetic supports or purely text based: Calcado description of Web applications can be construed subjectively thus leading to wrong expectations. To prevent setting incorrect expectations, which may are only learned during production or in worst cases at introduction time, useful specification ought to be complemented by simply visual helps (e. g. screenshots at least HTML representative models for home internet pages or any important navigation pages like sub-home pages for the purpose of the major sections of the site such as for recruiting, business units, invest, etc . ). This allows reducing subjective which implies and taking into account the users' feedback prior development. This kind of approach allows setting a good expectations and to avoid virtually any disappointments in the end once the fresh application is certainly online.
We certainly have observed these types of common blunders, independently whenever companies are suffering from their World wide web applications in house or subcontracted them to an external service provider.