Работа эмулятора была восстановлена, и теперь снова можно играть в денди игры онлайн :)
Common Mistakes: Functional Web Standards: What you need to know
Рейтинг: (Голосов: 1) Вы уже голосовали!
Useless functional specs for Web projects such as Web sites, Intranets or Sites contribute basically to gaps, higher costs or in applications which in turn not match the desires. Independent in the event the Web site, Intranet or Webpage is tailor made developed or built about packaged software program such as Web-, enterprise content management or perhaps portal software program, the practical specification sets the foundation intended for project delays and larger costs. To limit delays and surprising investments through the development procedure, the following problems should be avoided:
Too hazy or incomplete functional specification: This is the most popular mistake that companies do. Everything that is certainly ambiguously or not specific at all, designers do not put into action or use in a different way of what site owners want. This kind of relates mostly to Web features which can be considered as prevalent user goals. For example , CODE title tags, which are used to bookmark Internet pages. The Web steering committee may possibly specify that every page has a page subject, but would not specify that HTML Name tags has to be implemented too. Web developers as a result may usually do not implement HTML CODE Title tags or use them in a approach, which differs from site owners' visions. There are various other examples such as error controlling on via the internet forms and also the definition of alt texts to get images to comply with the disability operate section 508. These versions of look like specifics but in practice, if developers need to adjust hundreds or even thousands of pages, it amounts to several man-days or perhaps man-weeks. Specifically, the modifications for images as businesses need primary to explain the image labels prior that Web developers can implement the ATL text messages. Ambiguous useful specification may result as a result of lack of inside or external missing wonderful skills. In this instance, a one-day usability ideal practice workshop transfers the mandatory or at least simple usability expertise to the Net team. It is recommended, even with respect to companies that contain usability expertise or count on the subcontractor's skill set, that the external and neutral expert reviews the functional specification. Especially, as a result reviews connect with marginal spending as compared to the overall Web investments (e. g. about $10,50 K -- $15 E dollars for a review).
Future web page enhancement not identified or perhaps not communicated: It is crucial the fact that Web panel identifies in least the main future internet site enhancements and communicates these to the development team. In the very best case, the development team is aware the map for the approaching three years. This kind of approach permits the development workforce to anticipate implementation choices to a lot future site enhancements. It truly is more cost effective in mid- or perhaps long-term obtain more at first and to develop a flexible alternative. If World wide web teams have no idea of or even ignore future innovations, the risk pertaining to higher expense increases (e. g. adding new efficiency in the future results partially or at worst www.bonalcakes.es in totally restoring existing functionality). Looking at the financial delta for a flexible solution vs a solution just simply satisfying the present requirements, the flexible remedy has proven to be more cost-effective in practice from a mid- and long-term perspective.
Organized functionality not really aligned with internal methods: Many companies check out site efficiency only from a website visitor perspective (e. g. facilitation of searching info or executing transaction) and corporate benefits (e. g. monetary benefits of self-service features). However , there is a third dimension the effect of site functionality about internal methods. Site features that can seriously impact inside resources happen to be for example: -- Web sites: featuring news, on line recruitment, on-line support, and so forth - Intranets / portals: providing content maintenance functionality for business managers
It is essential for the success of site functionality that the Internet committee analyzes the impact and takes activities to ensure functions of the designed functionality. For example , providing the content maintenance efficiency to businesses and product mangers with an affiliated workflow. This kind of functionality is effective and can create business benefits such as reduced time to industry. However , used, business owners and product managers will need to produce, validate, review, approve and retire articles. This results in additional workload. If the Net committee has not defined inside the Web governance (processes, regulations, ownership and potentially enforcement), it may happen that this operation is certainly not used and so becomes pointless.
Wish to do this versus real needs and business requirements: The efficient specification is usually not lined up with wearer's needs or business requirements. This is more usual for inner applications just like Intranets or portals. In many cases, the task committee neglects to perform a sound inner survey and defines functionality by generalizing individual employees' wishes without any sound shows. Capturing the feedback of internal users across the firm allows identifying the crucial functionality. To effectively perform a survey a representative set of employees need to be wondered. Further these employees need to be categorized in profiles. The profiles should be characterized by for instance , frequency of usage of the Intranet, projected duration simply by visit, usage of the Intranet to facilitate their daily tasks, contribution to the business, etc . Depending on this information the net team are able to prioritize the functionality and find the most effective and relevant efficiency for the next launch. Less crucial or not as much important efficiency may be part of future releases (roadmap) or perhaps dropped. If such a sound decision process is normally not performed, it may happen that efficiency is developed but just used by couple of users as well as the return of investment is usually not obtained.
Not enough vision supports or purely textual content based: Fiel description of Web applications can be interpreted subjectively and therefore leading to wrong expectations. To avoid setting wrong expectations, which might are only determined during expansion or in worst cases at launch time, efficient specification need to be complemented simply by visual helps (e. g. screenshots or at best HTML representative models for home pages or any significant navigation webpages like sub-home pages just for the major parts of the site just like for recruiting, business units, funding, etc . ). This allows lowering subjective presentation and taking into consideration the users' feedback prior development. This approach will help setting a good expectations and avoid any kind of disappointments right at the end once the fresh application is usually online.
We now have observed these kinds of common errors, independently in the event that companies are suffering from their Internet applications internally or subcontracted them to another service provider.