Работа эмулятора была восстановлена, и теперь снова можно играть в денди игры онлайн :)
Common Mistakes: Efficient Web Requirements: What you need to know
Рейтинг: (Голосов: 1) Вы уже голосовали!
Useless functional requirements for World wide web projects including Web sites, mmtv.today Intranets or Portals contribute principally to delays, higher costs or in applications which in turn not meet the goals. Independent in the event the Web site, Intranet or Web destination is tailor made developed or built on packaged computer software such as Web-, enterprise content management or perhaps portal computer software, the functional specification value packs the foundation designed for project holds off and higher costs. To limit holdups hindrances impediments and surprising investments throughout the development procedure, the following problems should be avoided:
Too vague or imperfect functional standards: This is the most usual mistake that companies perform. Everything that is usually ambiguously or perhaps not specific at all, builders do not apply or apply in a different way of what webmasters want. This kind of relates mostly to Web features which might be considered as prevalent user objectives. For example , HTML title tags, which are used to bookmark Web pages. The Web steering committee might specify that every page has a page name, but will not specify that HTML Name tags needs to be implemented too. Web developers as a result may usually do not implement HTML Title tags or put into practice them in a approach, which may differ from internet site owners' dreams. There are various other examples just like error handling on via the internet forms and also the definition of ALT texts for the purpose of images to comply with the disability action section 508. These examples look like details but in practice, if programmers need to improve hundreds or even thousands of pages, that amounts to many man-days or maybe man-weeks. Specifically, the modifications for photos as company owners need initially to outline the image labels prior that Web developers may implement the ATL texts. Ambiguous functional specification can result because of the lack of interior or exterior missing usability skills. In cases like this, a one-day usability finest practice workshop transfers the mandatory or at least basic usability abilities to the Net team. It is recommended, even with respect to companies which may have usability expertise or count on the subcontractor's skill set, that the external and neutral professional reviews the functional standards. Especially, consequently reviews correspond with marginal spending as compared to the overall Web purchases (e. g. about $12 K - $15 K dollars for that review).
Future web page enhancement not really identified or perhaps not disseminated: It is crucial the fact that Web committee identifies in least the major future site enhancements and communicates those to the development team. In the greatest case, the expansion team is aware the map for the coming three years. This approach permits the development group to prepare for implementation selections to hosting server future web page enhancements. It can be more cost effective on mid- or perhaps long-term to take a position more initially and to build a flexible method. If World wide web teams have no idea or even disregard future improvements, the risk for higher financial commitment increases (e. g. adding new functionality in the future brings into reality partially or at worst in totally restoring existing functionality). Looking at the financial delta for a versatile solution vs . a solution simply just satisfying the actual requirements, the flexible remedy has proven to be more cost-effective in practice from a mid- and long-term point of view.
Designed functionality not aligned with internal resources: Many companies look at site operation only from a website visitor point of view (e. g. facilitation of searching details or performing transaction) and company benefits (e. g. financial benefits of self-service features). Yet , there is a third dimension the impact of internet site functionality on internal resources. Site efficiency that can heavily impact internal resources will be for example: - Web sites: rendering news, web based recruitment, on-line support, etc . - Intranets / sites: providing content maintenance features for business managers
It is crucial for the success of site features that the Web committee analyzes the impact and takes actions to ensure surgical procedures of the planned functionality. For example , providing the content maintenance features to business owners and merchandise mangers with an connected workflow. This functionality works well and can generate business benefits such as decreased time to marketplace. However , in practice, business owners and product managers will need to publish, validate, review, approve and retire content material. This leads to additional workload. If the World wide web committee have not defined in the Web governance (processes, packages, ownership and potentially enforcement), it may happen that this operation is not really used and therefore becomes ineffective.
Wish data versus real needs and business requirements: The practical specification is not in-line with customer's needs or business requirements. This is more usual for interior applications such as Intranets or portals. In many cases, the task committee neglects to perform a sound inner survey and defines functionality by generalizing individual employees' wishes without any sound shows. Capturing the feedback of internal users across the business allows deciding the critical functionality. To effectively execute a survey a representative set of employees need to be questioned. Further these kinds of employees ought to be categorized in to profiles. The profiles need to be characterized by for instance , frequency of usage of the Intranet, approximated duration simply by visit, use of the Intranet to facilitate their daily tasks, contribution to the business, etc . Depending on this information the net team will then prioritize the functionality and find the most effective and relevant features for the next release. Less essential or not as much important functionality may be part of future lets out (roadmap) or perhaps dropped. If perhaps such a sound decision process is usually not performed, it may happen that features is designed but just used by handful of users plus the return of investment can be not accomplished.
Not enough visual supports or purely text based: Textual description of Web applications can be interpreted subjectively so therefore leading to wrong expectations. In order to avoid setting wrong expectations, which might are only learned during development or at worst at start time, functional specification ought to be complemented by visual supports (e. g. screenshots at least HTML prototypes for home webpages or any key navigation pages like sub-home pages with respect to the major parts of the site just like for recruiting, business units, solutions, etc . ). This allows minimizing subjective presentation and taking into consideration the users' feedback previous development. This kind of approach assists setting an appropriate expectations and also to avoid any kind of disappointments at the conclusion once the fresh application is normally online.
We now have observed these types of common errors, independently in the event companies allow us their Web applications inside or subcontracted them to a service provider.